从“认识论”到“认知论”——刑事诉讼法学研究之科学化走向
法制与社会发展[ISSN:1006-6128/CN:22-1243/D]
卷:
期数:
2021年01期
页码:
146-168
栏目:
部门法哲学研究
出版日期:
2021-01-10
- Keywords:
- Epistemology of Criminal Procedure; Cognitivism of Criminal Procedure; Cognitive Science; Objective Truth; Legal Truth; Methodology
- 摘要:
- 关于“刑事诉讼认识论”的理论争鸣在我国刑事诉讼法学研究中具有里程碑意义。然而，似是而非的证明标准、僵化误用的证明模式以及异化失灵的程序设计均表明，“刑事诉讼认识论”并未对立法与司法实践产生足够积极的影响，理论实效不如预期。因此，亟需在我国刑事诉讼认识论的研究基础之上，合理吸收域外成果，拓展知识边界，探索理论与实践良性互动的可能。其中，将具有“硬科学”依据的认知科学引入刑事诉讼法学研究，并与“刑事诉讼认识论”有效对接，是知识创新的可能路径。“刑事诉讼认知论”与“刑事诉讼认识论”在知识背景、理论自洽性以及对立法和司法实践的期许方面均存在区别，因此，欲探索理性认知向度的知识增量，就首先需要促成认知科学与刑事诉讼基础理论的对话，进而为刑事诉讼法学研究的科学化贡献智识资源。
- Abstract:
- The theoretical controversy of “Epistemology of Criminal Procedure” has a milestone significance in the research of criminal procedure law in ChinaHowever, specious proof standards, rigid proof modes, and dysfunctional procedure designing indicate that “Epistemology of Criminal Procedure” only unilaterally attempts to influence legislation and judicial practice, but has not received a positive response from the latterTherefore, there is an urgent need to absorb foreign research achievements, expand knowledge boundaries, and explore the possibility of a benign interaction between theory and practice on the basis of foregoing research of “Epistemology of Criminal Procedure”One of the possible paths to knowledge innovation is the introduction of cognitive science and the combination with “Epistemology of Criminal Procedure”Since “Epistemology of Criminal Procedure” and “Cognitive Theory of Criminal Procedure” are different in terms of knowledge background, theoretical compatibleness and expectations for legislation and judicial practice, the construction in rational cognitive dimension should first promote the dialogue between cognitive science and basic theories of criminal procedure, and then dedicate intellectual resources to the trend of scientific development of criminal procedure research.
备注/Memo
*中国政法大学刑事司法学院副教授。
本文系国家社会科学基金重点项目“中国司法的政治性及其边界研究”（17AFX003）的阶段性成果。
更新日期/Last Update:
2020-01-10