作为共识凝聚框架的法理论
法制与社会发展[ISSN:1006-6128/CN:22-1243/D]
卷:
期数:
2021年01期
页码:
75-88
栏目:
法理中国研究
出版日期:
2021-01-10
- 摘要:
- 中国法理学的危机在于学界缺乏共识，法教义学和社科法学存在分歧以及法理学知识冗余。面对众多基于不同的立场、思维惯性形成的法理概念，法理共识的形成需要前提预设，即需要通过以实证法为核心的法理论建立法理学的共识框架。法理学需要由法理论和法哲学所组成的二阶构造。作为“边哨学科”的法理论将与实证法不相关的东西排除在外，保证共识的形成，法哲学则为法理学提供更基础、更具体系性、更与时俱进的相关学科理论。法理学应形成法理论和法哲学的“诠释学循环”。
- Abstract:
- The crisis of Chinese jurisprudence lies in the lack of consensus, the divergence between legal dogmatics and social-legal studies, and the redundancy of jurisprudential knowledgeIt needs presupposition to make many jurisprudential concepts based on different standpoints and thinking inertia form legal consensus, that is, the legal theory with positive law as the core establishes the consensus framework of jurisprudenceJurisprudence is composed of legal theory and philosophy of lawAs a “frontier discipline”, the legal theory excludes the things that are not related to positive law to ensure the formation of consensus; while philosophy of law provides jurisprudence with more basic, systematic and up-to-date thinking and content of related discipline theoriesOnly by forming the hermeneutic cycle of legal theory and legal philosophy can jurisprudence ensure the formation of consensus and the development of body of knowledge.
备注/Memo
*南京师范大学法学院副教授，南京师范大学中国法治现代化研究院研究员。
本文系国家社会科学基金一般项目“当代中国法教义学的本土化路径与限度研究”（19BFX024）的阶段性成果。
更新日期/Last Update:
2020-01-10