[1]杨立新.我国民法典立法思想的选择和坚守——从《民法总则》制定中的立法思想冲突谈起[J].法制与社会发展,2018,(04):5-23.
点击复制

我国民法典立法思想的选择和坚守——从《民法总则》制定中的立法思想冲突谈起()
分享到:

法制与社会发展[ISSN:1006-6128/CN:22-1243/D]

卷:
期数:
2018年04期
页码:
5-23
栏目:
全面依法治国研究
出版日期:
2018-07-08

文章信息/Info

作者:
杨立新
关键词:
民法总则立法思想人文主义冲突借鉴
Keywords:
the General Provisions of the Civil Code Legislative Thought Humanism Conflict Reference
摘要:
《民法总则》主导的立法思想是民法的人文主义思想,它引导了《民法总则》立法的基本方向。其它非主流性的立法思想也有相当的影响,使得我国《民法总则》存在一些不尽如人意之处。编纂民法典的工作正在进行中,在民法分则各编的编纂中,还存在一些应当改进之处。应当进一步总结《民法总则》编纂过程中的经验教训,对民法分则各编立法中可能出现的立法思想冲突进行预判。应当满足保障人的尊严、地位和权利的需求,坚持以满足市场经济发展的需求为立法导向,自觉坚持民法的人文主义立法思想,在现在的立法基础上,遵循科学立法、民主立法和依法立法的原则,把民法分则各编修改得更好,制定出一部符合二十一世纪时代精神的中国民法典。
Abstract:
The leading legislative thought of the General Provisions of the Civil Code is the humanistic thought of the civil law, which guides the general direction of legislation. Other non-mainstream legislative thought also has considerable influence, mainly reflected in the inappropriate norms in legislation, and results in some legislative inadequacies in the General Provisions of the Civil Code. There are still many problems to be solved while codifying the specific provisions of the Civil Code. We should summarize the legislative conflict and experience for reference when formulating the General Provisions of the Civil Code and predict the possible legislative conflict. We should satisfy the need of human dignity, status and rights, take the market economy as the legislative guide and adhere to the scientific legislative concept. We should also follow the basic principles of scientific legislation, democratic legislation and legislation by law based on the existing legal basis, so that we can better revise the specific provisions of the Civil Code and formulate the Civil Code Law that meets the spirit of the 21st century.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*天津大学法学院卓越教授,中国人民大学民商事法律科学研究中心研究员、博士生导师,中国法学会民法学研究会副会长。
本文系教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“编纂我国民法典的重大问题研究”(15JJD820009)的阶段性成果。感谢匿名评审专家提出的宝贵意见。
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-07-10