[1]孙海波.不存在疑难案件?[J].法制与社会发展,2017,(04):52-69.
点击复制

不存在疑难案件?()
分享到:

法制与社会发展[ISSN:1006-6128/CN:22-1243/D]

卷:
期数:
2017年04期
页码:
52-69
栏目:
西方法哲学
出版日期:
2017-07-10

文章信息/Info

作者:
孙海波
关键词:
简单案件疑难案件有限存在法律解释理解法律
Keywords:
Easy Case Hard Case Limited Existence Interpretation of Law Understanding of Law
摘要:
人们通常在经验上理所当然地接受简单案件与疑难案件的二分法。然而,在理论上,这一判断却遭遇了不少挑战。有论者主张并不存在疑难案件;相反,另一些论者认为一切案件都是疑难案件。法律的不确定性、指引的有限性以及法律内在的可争辩性使得疑难案件必然存在,但这只是法律实践的例外状态。在大多数情形中,我们并不总是需要解释法律。重构法律之理解与法律之解释之间的关系对于认识疑难案件的存在范围意义重大。
Abstract:
People often naturally accept the dichotomy of easy cases and hard cases by experience However, this view has encountered many challenges in theory We can see some argues there are no hard cases at all, while others urge each case in fact is a hard case Due to the uncertainty of law, limitations of social guidance, and the inner arguable feature, hard cases will inevitably occur in practice, but what should be noted is this is just the exceptional state of legal practice In most cases, we dont always need to interpret the laws To reconstruct the relationship between understanding of law and interpretation of law is of great significance to recognize the existence scope of hard case.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*中国政法大学比较法学研究院讲师,法学博士。
本文系国家社科基金重大项目“构建中国特色案例制度的综合系统研究”(16ZDA068)的阶段性成果。本文曾提交第十届东亚法哲学大会。感谢范立波、陈征楠、杨建、郑玉双等师友的批评和建议,感谢匿名评审专家所提出的宝贵修改建议,当然文责自负。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01