[1]孙 皓.论公诉权运行的机械性逻辑[J].法制与社会发展,2017,(05):87-103.
点击复制

论公诉权运行的机械性逻辑()
分享到:

法制与社会发展[ISSN:1006-6128/CN:22-1243/D]

卷:
期数:
2017年05期
页码:
87-103
栏目:
司法文明研究
出版日期:
2017-09-10

文章信息/Info

作者:
孙 皓
公诉权运行的合理化程度,直接影响着刑事司法活动的公正、效率以及权威等方面的要素。而检察机关日常办案的机械主义倾向,却导致一系列的负面影响。具体来说,这种机械性逻辑体现于实体、程序以及证据运用等多个维度。通过实证调查获取的典型个案,有助于准确把握此类现象的发展脉络。“价值—制度—主体”的三要素组合,促成了公诉权机械性运转的常态逻辑。为了克服这种行为模式所造成的现实弊端,需要以循序渐进的方式推动诉讼生态从微观到宏观的全面转变,直至检察机关可以自主、能动地行使公诉权。
Keywords:
Individual Cases the Power of Prosecution Mechanism Criminal Justice
摘要:
个案;公诉权;机械性;刑事司法
Abstract:
The rationalization of the operation of the power of prosecution has direct influence on essential factors of criminal justice such as fairness, efficiency and authority. However, the tendency of mechanism which rooted in daily working of procuratorial organ would bring about some negative effects. To be specific, the logic of mechanism reflects in different aspects of entity, procedure and evidence. According to typical cases derived from empirical research, this phenomenon may be recognized accurately and regularly. The combination of the three elements of “value,institutionand subject” leads to the normal logic of the mechanical operation of public prosecution power. To eliminate the actual defect caused by such behavior pattern, we need to change the ecosystem of criminal justice from micro level to macro level step by step, until the power of prosecution can be exercised autonomously and dynamically.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*天津大学法学院讲师。
本文系教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“罪犯权利保障实证研究”(16JJD820016)、2017年度最高人民检察院检察理论研究一般课题“无罪判决案件中的公诉质量评价”(GJ2017C24)的阶段性成果。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01