[1]邹立君.司法权能:规范法官裁决的程序性思维[J].法制与社会发展,2017,(05):74-86.
点击复制

司法权能:规范法官裁决的程序性思维()
分享到:

法制与社会发展[ISSN:1006-6128/CN:22-1243/D]

卷:
期数:
2017年05期
页码:
74-86
栏目:
司法文明研究
出版日期:
2017-09-10

文章信息/Info

作者:
邹立君
程序法理学关注的核心问题是,各项制度是否都拥有特定的权能领域,特定的任务能否被分配给某一制度而无需考虑其所包含的实质政策,某一制度所具有的特殊权能与怎样的特定程序相适应。在程序法理学的思想脉络之中,这一问题牵涉到司法与理性、司法与意志等论题,并经由“司法权能”这一特定概念表达出来,且具体化为“理性阐释”这样的程序性约束,从而勾勒出程序法理学的独特司法图景。在这种司法图景下,法官必须尊重其他制度的权能并且在“法治”的框架下来说明他们的决定;更重要的是,规范法官裁决的关键就在于如何确立与确立什么样的程序性权能,而非只依赖于实质性追责规定。
Keywords:
Judicial Competence Reasoned Elaboration Process Thinking
摘要:
司法权能;理性阐释;程序性思维
Abstract:
The main concern of process jurisprudence is whether each institution of government has specific areas of competence, whether a particular task can be assigned to some institution without considering the substantive policy it contains, and what kind of specific procedurescan be adapted to the special competence of some institution. In the thought context of process jurisprudence,this issue involves sometopics on justice and reason as well as justice and will.It is expressed bythe particular concept of “judicial competence”, embodied as a procedural constraint such as “reasoned elaboration”,and thus sketchs out the unique judicial picture of process jurisprudence. Under this judicial picture, judges must respect the competence of other institutions, and explain their decisions in the framework of the rule of law. More importantly, the key to regulating judges decision is how to establish procedural competence and what kind of competence we should establish, rather thanrelying solely on substantive accountability.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*南京大学法学院副教授,硕士生导师。
本文系国家社会科学基金青年项目“司法政策与裁判正义实证研究”(11CFX054)的阶段性成果。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01