[1]沈宏彬*.反对形式法治[J].法制与社会发展,2017,(02):61-73.
点击复制

反对形式法治()
分享到:

法制与社会发展[ISSN:1006-6128/CN:22-1243/D]

卷:
期数:
2017年02期
页码:
61-73
栏目:
西方法哲学
出版日期:
2017-03-10

文章信息/Info

作者:
沈宏彬*
关键词:
规范指引义务法治形式法治实质法治
Keywords:
Normative Guidance Obligation the Rule of Law the Formal Conception of the Rule of Law the Substantive Conception of the Rule of law
摘要:
法治表达了法律自身的理想状态。在该状态下,法律能够成功指引接受其统治之人的行动,而合理的法治观所包含的法治原则,应当确保法律实现这种理想状态。实现这种状态则必须调和法律所施加的义务性要求中,公共性与第二人称性之间的内在张力。形式法治中所包含的法治原则,只限制了法律形式和渊源,而不限制法律实质内容。这导致它并不能成功调和这一张力,因此它是一种失败的法治观。合理的法治观念必然是一种同时限制法律形式和实质的实质法治观。
Abstract:
The rule of law means an ideal status of the legal system. In that status, legal system can give a normative guidance to the subject. A reasonable conception of the rule of law should contain some principles, which can guarantee that the status comes true in the legal system. In order to get into the status, the conception of the rule of law should resolve the tension between the property of publicity and of second-person which are in the requirements of legal obligations imposed by law. The formal conception of law can only restrict the forms and sources of law. It cannot restrict the substance of law. So it cannot reconcile the tension, and this fact shows that the formal conception of the rule of law is failed. A reasonable conception should be a substantive conception of the rule of law, which can restrict the form and substance of law in the same time.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*华东政法大学科学研究院师资博士后,法学博士。
特别感谢中国政法大学陈景辉、范立波教授,蓟门法哲学研习会孟媛媛、陈竞之,广东财经大学黄伟文博士,以及南京师范大学杨建博士,在本文写作中给予的批评和建议,当然本文责任完全由作者承担。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01