[1]陈坤.法律、语言与司法判决的确定性——语义学能给我们提供什么?[J].法制与社会发展,2010,(04):61.
 CHEN Kun.Law, Language, and the Definiteness of Judicial Decisions[J].Law and social development,2010,(04):61.
点击复制

法律、语言与司法判决的确定性——语义学能给我们提供什么?()
分享到:

法制与社会发展[ISSN:1006-6128/CN:22-1243/D]

卷:
期数:
2010年04期
页码:
61
栏目:
司法学
出版日期:
2010-08-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Law, Language, and the Definiteness of Judicial Decisions
作者:
陈坤
(北京大学 法学院,北京 100871)
Author(s):
CHEN Kun
(Law School, Peking University, Beijing, 100871)
关键词:
法律语言语义学司法判决的确定性
Keywords:
law language semantics the definiteness of judicial decisions
分类号:
DF0-055
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
在哲学发生语言学转向之后,传统法律理论在诸多方面都受到了语言学的冲击。一些明示或隐含地以某种语义学理论为依据来解决司法判决确定性问题的方案被提出,包括“法律术语方案”、“指称理论方案”以及“语法与解释规则方案”。严格说来,这些方案都无法解决问题,其根本原因在于,在疑难案件中,语义模糊只是表象,其背后是某种常规实践方式或有效社会共识的缺乏;而对语义与概念的争论也只是表象,其背后是不同的关于结果的实质性考量。因此,一个妥当的对语义学的评价就是:它也许能够澄清问题,但不能解决问题;也许能够论证我们的决定,但不能帮助我们做出决定。
Abstract:
After philosophy turns to linguistics, traditional legal theory is influenced very much by linguistics in many aspects. Some plans have been proposed based on the theory of linguistics, such as “legal terms plan”, “referring theory plan” or “grammar and interpretation plan”. Such plans are in reality not adequate because they noticed just the phenomena of language but not the essence of social identity on practical method based on certain norms. In sum, the evaluation of linguistics on such issue is that it makes the problem clear but not good enough to solve such problems.

参考文献/References:

[1]刘星.法律是什么[M].广州:广东旅游出版社,1997.
[2]大卫·布林科.法律解释、客观性和道德[A].[英]莱特.法律和道德领域的客观性[C].高中等译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2007.
[3]Ian P.Farrell. H.L.A.Hart and the Methodology of Jurisprudence[J].Texas Law Review, 2005,(84).
[4]廖美珍.论法学的语言转向[J].社会科学战线,2006,(2).
[5][美]劳伦斯·M.索兰.法官语言[M].张清等译.北京:法律出版社,2007.
[6][英]哈特.法律的概念[M].许家馨,李冠宜译.北京:法律出版社,2006.
[7]D.Kennedy. The Structure of Blackstone’s Commentaries[J].Buffalo Law Review, 1979,(28).
[8]Lon L. Fuller. Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart[J].Harvard Law Review, 1958,(71).
[9]Noam Chomsky. Reflections on Language[M].New York: Pantheon Books, 1975.
[10]Karl Llewellyn. Remarks on the Theory of Appellate Decision and the Rules or Canons about How Statutes are to be Construed[J]. Vanderbilt Law Review, 1950, (3).
[11][美]波斯纳.法理学问题[M].苏力译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002.
[12]Ray. Jackendoff. Semantics and Cognition[M]. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1983.
[13][波]A.沙夫.语义学引论[M].罗兰等译.北京:商务印书馆,1979.
[14][美]布莱恩·比克斯.法律、语言与法律的确定性[M].邱昭继译.北京:法律出版社,2007.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2009-12-22作者简介:陈坤(1984-),男,江苏徐州人,北京大学法学院法学理论专业2009级博士研究生。
更新日期/Last Update: 2010-08-30